People are often surprised when they first learn that a living person may donate his or her liver — “don’t you need your liver?” is a common question.

In fact, living donor liver transplantation, or LDLT, is not only possible, but is the optimal choice for patients who need a liver transplant.

The advantages of LDLT are dramatic, as the family of Aidan Ward recently learned. The teenage boy from New Jersey, his liver failing due to primary sclerosing cholangitis, was placed on the organ waitlist in January 2010. But for someone in need of a new liver, he was relatively healthy, which meant that he was far down on the list and was unlikely to receive a liver from a deceased donor for several years. Alternatively, a living donor transplant would allow their son to receive a liver much sooner. With a living donor operation, Aidan would be in much better health during the transplant, enabling him to better withstand the surgery and recover more quickly. Second, his long-term outcomes, including his liver function and overall survival, would be significantly better with a living donor than with a deceased donor organ.

For the Ward family, the choice was clear: according to Aidan’s father, Michael, “If Aidan had to wait several years to receive a deceased donor liver, his health would continue to deteriorate. Getting a new liver sooner would likely enable Aidan to catch up with his peers and return to a normal life much faster.” The thought of Aidan going through high school with persistent health issues ‘sealed the deal,’ his father recalls, and Michael began the thorough process of medical and psychological evaluation to determine whether he was a suitable living donor. He was deemed eligible to donate in early April, and the operation was promptly scheduled for April 13 – less than four months after Aidan was initially placed on the transplant list.

LDLT is made possible by the unique capability of the human liver to regenerate. It is the only internal organ in the human body with this capability. This allows a living person to donate part of his or her liver according to the following procedure: first, the recipient’s diseased liver is partially or entirely removed; at roughly the same time, a portion of the donor’s liver is removed (up to 60% for an adult transplant, and up to 20-25% for transplant to a child); and that portion is implanted in the recipient where the original liver had been. Over time, that small portion will grow into a full-sized, fully functional liver. Similarly, the donor’s remaining liver will regenerate over the following weeks, eventually regaining full functionality. In short, two livers are generated from one.

Cholangiogram of primary sclerosing cholangitis

Cholangiogram of primary sclerosing cholangitis *

On the day of surgery, Benjamin Samstein, MD, Jean Emond, MD, and their team removed about 25-30% of Michael’s liver — a little less than usual, partly because Michael’s liver was especially large and partly because of Aidan’s youth and size. The surgeons were able to do the procedure laparoscopically, which reduced the likelihood of complications, greatly reduced scarring, and prompted a smoother recovery. Meanwhile, Tomoaki Kato, MD and his team placed the liver segment in Aidan’s abdomen in a nearby room. In a matter of about eight hours, it was all over, both operations completed successfully.

Only four days after the operation, Michael was feeling well enough to go home. An avid cyclist, he was soon back to riding his usual distances. The after-effects of the surgery were relatively minimal, he says, including a few weeks for normal GI function and sleep patterns to return, and a month to recover from a torn nerve in his shoulder (it was unclear whether this occurred from arm placement during surgery or stress on the shoulder during recovery). Mike’s liver maintained acceptable function throughout the post-transplant period and by three months had grown to its original size.

Aidan’s recovery took longer, not only because of the more demanding nature of his operation, but also because his subsequent medication regimen was complicated by his Crohn’s disease. He had missed many months of school, but thanks to in-home tutoring provided by the school district over the summer, he was able to make up for lost time, and he enrolled in eighth grade, with his friends, in the fall. He was feeling well enough by then to attend school full-time.

According to Aidan’s father, “My wife and I were both so impressed with the entire staff at NYPH/Columbia, I felt confident that the medical team was the best in the world and they would do everything in their power to make sure I came out okay. I put complete trust in them.” He found it reassuring that the surgeons had expressed a willingness to halt the procedure for any reason: “They said they can stop at any point, and that if they ever felt I was at risk, they would stop. That was one thing that came across very clearly. They’re extremely focused on ensuring the health and safety of the donor. The donor is a healthy person and they don’t want to change that.”

Aidan’s mother, Frances Ward, said that her son’s and husband’s successful results were due not only to the surgeons who performed the transplant, but to the “extraordinary” nursing care at every step from pre-operative testing through post-surgical care, from physical care to psychological care. She also appreciated that the staff was meticulous about ensuring that family members were fully informed about each aspect of treatment before it was done.

By way of advice to other prospective organ donors, Mike shares that the emotional aspects were perhaps more challenging than the physical for him. He advises others against underestimating the mental aspect of the process: “I certainly underestimated the effect the entire experience has on one’s mental state. I found I was more keenly aware of and responsive to emotional situations… It was as if my emotions were always ‘on edge.’ However, not once do I regret what I went through, especially as I watch Aidan – now in high school – continue to thrive. I’m still amazed that I was able to give a piece of my liver to my son to save his life.”

Learn more about living donor liver transplantation visit Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation.

* Photo Credit: http://bit.ly/wwo8mL

{ 0 comments }

The physician’s ability to treat breast cancer is advancing every year. Yet in spite of these innovations, a diagnosis of breast cancer can still be traumatic, even earth shattering. Just ask Giuliana Rancic.

In a recently published magazine article, Guiliana and her husband Bill talked about their experience with breast cancer since Giuliana’s diagnosis in October 2011. The bright spot, in their reflection, was approaching this situation as rationally as possible. Breast cancer treatment had to be treated like other decisions. What are the options and the pros and cons of each? Before they could do that, there were certain things they needed to know.

On June 6th at 12:00 ET, the Columbia University Department of Surgery Clinical Breast Cancer Program will be hosting the first in a series of three Blog Talk Radio shows with Dr. Sheldon Feldman on what you need to know about breast cancer.

breast cancer pink ribbon tree

breast cancer pink ribbon tree

Topics covered in this first show will be:

  • Breast Health: Prevention & Family History: Are you at risk and are there ways to reduce your likelihood of ever developing breast cancer? What are the available screening tools and what are their advantages and disadvantage? How safe is it to wait if there is a finding? False positives. Recommended screening schedules based on personal history

Topics covered in the second show will be:

  • Early Diagnosed Breast Cancer: What are the early symptoms that accompany breast cancer? Can you have breast cancer without having any symptoms? What are my options? Needle biopsy, surgery, and treatment of local mass vs. systemic chemo, radiation, RFA, and more.
  • Needle or Knife: When a lump is found, should you consider having a biopsy before resorting to surgery?

Topics covered in the third show will be:

  • Advanced Stage Breast Cancer: What are my options for cure and longevity? What are my treatment options? Is prophylactic mastectomy effective and recommended?

For details, to schedule a reminder or to submit a question to be answered by Dr. Feldman during the broadcast, please visit our What You Need to Know About Breast Cancer events page. Then on Wednesday June 6th at 12:00 PM ET go to the Columbia University Department of Surgery Blog Talk Radio Channel to listen to the show.

If you like to tweet, follow #cumedchat for a live Twitter Q&A during the show.

{ 0 comments }

Reflections of a Living Liver Donor

by Columbia Surgery on April 30, 2012

In July 2009, I was a liver donor to my 21 year old daughter, Jen, whose liver failed due to autoimmune hepatitis. I first wrote about the experience in December 2009. Though I accurately captured the emotion and the gratitude I felt at the time, I glossed over many aspects of the journey. Our lives had not yet gotten back to normal, and although Jen would return to school in a few weeks, part of me was still holding my breath, overwhelmed by all we had been through and a little fearful of the future. Now, with the passage of time and watching Jen resume her life in continued good health, it is easier to write the story.

Our story begins in January 2008 with a phone call from her roommate letting us know that they were bringing her to an ER because she was vomiting blood. I remember telling myself, as I drove down to her college in Maryland, that she couldn’t be that sick because she had just been home the week before. Finding her in the intensive care unit hooked up to IV’s dispelled that illusion. Within the hour, one of the doctors informed me that they were readying her for transport to another hospital because they believed she would need a liver transplant. I thought I had misheard him. As he repeated it and the word ‘transplant’ reverberated through my head, all I could imagine was the nightmare of watching Jen getting progressively sicker as she waited for a donor organ. Given that Jen had two younger brothers back in NJ, and knowing that this would be a long journey, I suggested we need to find a hospital in NY. After some research and help from friends, we were flown to NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia.

Jen and Susanne Mullman

Jen and Susanne Mullman

Dr. Brown began evaluating her to determine what had caused my daughter’s liver to fail. Midway through the testing he mentioned to me that if she did need a transplant, she would be a good candidate for living donation. That was the first time I had ever heard those words, and as he described the procedure I felt as if someone had thrown me a lifeline. Here was a way to help Jen out of this nightmare. After two days of testing, he determined that a small portion of her liver was still working and,with medication, she could resume her life for a time. She went back to college that summer and continued until spring break -March 2009- when, during a scheduled visit, Dr. Brown told us she now needed the transplant.

As hard as it was to hear those words again, we were prepared. Jen was listed for transplantation with UNOS and allowed to return to college to finish her semester. The next day we contacted the living donor office at NYPH/Columbia. Her father opted to be evaluated first, but the tests determined that he would not be a good candidate due to underlying health conditions. I am sure it was as hard for the doctors to say as it was for him to hear, but seeing that their paramount concern was for the safety of the donors was very reassuring. The next day I started the evaluation, which involves several days of tests and meetings with various team members. I was relieved when they called to say I could donate! Jen could now have the transplant at an optimal time for her! (Because of the nature of her disease, Jen’s MELD score would have remained low, resulting in a very long wait for a donor organ had she remained on the UNOS waitlist.)

In my opinion, living donation is easier on the family than waiting for a donor organ. I know that sounds counterintuitive, but it is true. You have time to make a plan, which gives you some control. You set a date that is optimal for the patient and all family members. You have time to organize two care teams for the recipient and the donor. When I remember the chaos that ensued during Jen’s first hospitalization, and the smooth organized weeks we had after the transplant surgery, the value of having time to prepare can not be overstated. Knowing that family and friends were caring for Jen and her siblings made it easier for me to focus on healing after the surgery.

All the preparation and planning got my mind focused and my spirit strong, at least until the week before surgery. Some personal issues and an awareness of my own weakness when it comes to needles and blood (I faint!) made me start to doubt myself. I was not afraid of the surgery because I trusted my surgeon, Dr. Samstein. But I was afraid that I would have a panic attack and I wouldn’t be able to donate, and that I would let Jen down and myself. Jen and I went in together for our pre-operative appointments. Dr. Samstein explained the surgery — a partially laparoscopic procedure involving removal of my left lobe (about 40% of my liver). I remember sitting there numbly trying to control my rising anxiety. We discussed my issues with needles and agreed that we would decide the morning of surgery whether to have an epidural. Then Dr. Samstein looked at me in a very calm and kind manner and assured me that he takes special care of the living donors. I don’t know what it was exactly, but this sense of calm enveloped me and I felt safe! On the way home I told Jen that I had been afraid, but now I believed everything was going to be fine. And it was!

The morning of the surgery was surreal. Walking into the OR is a strange experience. I opted not to have the epidural, but I did go under anesthesia before having any IV’s inserted. I remember waking up, seeing my family and having them tell me that Jen was ok and then falling back to sleep. The following morning, much to my surprise, there was Jen, IV pole in tow, walking into my room looking strong and full of energy. It is one of my favorite memories! The next four days in the hospital passed quickly. I was never really in pain because it was well managed. There was discomfort at the site of the scar, but most of my time was spent sleeping. I was glad to get home and shower and sleep in my own bed. I continued on painkillers for about a week and then would take Tylenol just at night for another few days. I started walking around the block. Friends would drop off food and we would venture a little further each day. I remained tired. There is deep fatigue as your body works to regrow the liver, but within five weeks it had dissipated and I resumed my normal activities. I do not work outside of the home but keep busy with my children’s activities and volunteering.

Jen was in the hospital for two weeks with a small infection. She had some difficulty initially adjusting to the medications but has since done well. She returned to college and graduated in January 2011. She is working now and plans to return to school in September for her Masters. Often when we run into someone in town who has heard the story, they are surprised to see how well Jen looks.

What have I learned from this experience? I have learned that I have a strong daughter who faced this adversity with courage and grace. Though I know that this is still the beginning and there will be bumps in the road, she will be okay. The CLDT team will always be there to take care of her.

I discovered my own courage and strength and it has served me well as I travel through this life. I have a renewed appreciation for my own health, and I exercise and eat healthier than I did prior to surgery. I am thankful that I was given the chance to help my daughter. I think we all believe that if a loved one was sick, we would do anything to help them. Living donors get the chance to do just that. We are the lucky ones! That sentiment, and the fact that we would all do it again in a heartbeat, is echoed by all the living donors I have met.

Lastly, I recognize how truly difficult it is to express the gratitude that we feel to all who helped us during this journey. To the family and friends who lovingly surrounded us with their support. To the doctors and nurses who cared for Jen. To the living donor team who safely guided me through this process, especially Dr. Samstein. I know how lucky I was to be on the receiving end of his extraordinary dedication, skill and compassion.

So in an effort to give back and, in some small way, help another family facing this situation, I became a living donor mentor and volunteer on the transplant floor of the hospital. By helping others I hope to honor those who helped us. This can be a long and arduous journey, but with the exceptional care provided by the Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, support of family and friends, and guidance from those who have gone before, the path is made easier.

Susanne Mullman

Related Link:
An Open Letter to Prospective Liver Donors

{ 0 comments }

Are You a Heartosaurus?

by Columbia Surgery on April 26, 2012

According to the website www.heartosaurus.com that Benjamin Carey created, a Heartosaurus is:

  1. An inspiring online reference for open heart surgery patients.
  2. A heart patient with an inextinguishable desire not merely to survive, but to live life to its fullest.
  3. A doctor, caregiver, or anyone who makes a profound difference to the cause.
Heartosaurus.com

Heartosaurus.com

Carey was a NYP patient after an ascending aortic aneurysm diagnosis in 2009. Dr. Allan Stewart performed his surgery and a year later ran the New York City Marathon with Carey.

The website contains a wealth of information on symptoms and treatment, patient resources, video stories, and a new bulletin-board feature. As Carey writes on the site, “In these pages you will find a wealth of inspiring, truthful, raw, and sometimes intimate information surrounding open heart surgery. ‘Marathons’ come in many forms, and many of the contributors have their own to speak of.”

Meanwhile, Dr. Stewart has developed a novel stentless biologic aortic root-valve conduit called the Columbia Bioroot that is discussed on the Heartosaurus forum www.heartosaurus.com/forum.

{ 0 comments }

Who Might Need a Transplant?

Most candidates for a pancreas transplant fall into three main categories, all of which are related to diabetes, according to Lloyd E. Ratner, MD, Director of the NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia Renal and Pancreatic Transplant Program.

Most candidates have type 1 diabetes and kidney failure. They either need or already have had a kidney transplant. Other patients do not have kidney failure but are “brittle” type 1 diabetics; despite vigilance in taking their insulin and how they eat, their blood sugar still is very difficult to control, and they have serious complications associated with their diabetes. People in the third group can’t tell when they have low blood sugar and are in danger of losing consciousness or dying. This condition is called hypoglycemic unawareness.

What are the Benefits of Pancreas Transplantation?

The three important benefits of replacing a pancreas are:

  1. A huge improvement in a patient’s lifestyle. Instead of spending up to three hours a day in controlling blood sugar, they will enjoy stable levels without insulin or any special diet.
  2. By significantly improving or ending the patient’s diabetes, pancreas transplantation will protect a patient’s new kidney from being injured.
  3. It often slows down or even reverses secondary complications from diabetes: eye disease, vascular disease, gastrointestinal problems, and neuropathy.

What are the Risks of Pancreas Transplantation?

A certain amount of risk comes with a pancreas transplant, as in any surgery. If the pancreas is injured by mishandling or low blood pressure, it can release digestive enzymes, cause inflammation of the surrounding tissue, and make a patient feel fairly sick. Also, the blood supply to the pancreas is more tenuous than to other organs, so there is a greater chance of clotting.

But these risks decrease to a minimal level as long as surgeons are very careful about caring for the pancreas before and during surgery. The net result for almost all candidates is that a pancreas transplant’s benefits greatly exceed its risks.

Dr. Ratner explains more about pancreas transplants in this video.

Related Link:
New Approach to Treating Type I Diabetes? Columbia Scientists Transform Gut Cells into Insulin Factories

{ 5 comments }

Three scenarios for getting a new pancreas are possible.

  1. You may receive both a pancreas and a kidney at the same time from the same deceased donor.
  2. You may first receive a kidney from a living donor, and then later have a pancreas transplant from a deceased donor.
  3. The small percentage of patients with hypoglycemic awareness who do not have any significant kidney injury may receive a pancreas transplant alone.

In option one, if the patient’s body rejects the kidney, it will reject the pancreas at the same time. That is a small advantage because otherwise it’s hard to detect pancreas rejection, which is almost always treatable. This occurs in about 10 percent of patients.

The second option is preferable because kidney transplant results are significantly better when from a living donor. Also, it can take years to get a kidney from a deceased donor, while waiting times for a pancreas alone is much shorter.

The Operation And Beyond

Pancreas transplant surgery takes between four to six hours. A lot of that time is spent carefully preparing the pancreas. The pancreas is placed in the right side of the abdomen through a vertical incision. Another advantage to having already had a kidney transplant is a shorter, smoother operation.

Most patients go to the Intensive Care Unit for one to two days for very close monitoring, then transfer to a regular hospital floor for seven to 10 days. Follow up is similar to that after a kidney transplant: frequent at first, and eventually laboratory work once a month and office visits three to four times a year.

Dr. Lloyd E. Ratner, Director of the NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia Renal and Pancreatic Transplant Program, explains more about pancreas transplants in this video:

Related Link:
Everything You Need to Know About Pancreas Transplants: Part I

{ 0 comments }

When 46-year-old Sharon Lupo started having stomach pains before Christmas, she brushed it off as a case of too much pre-holiday indulgence. But the pain persisted even after the holidays ended, landing her in the local emergency room. Many tests, scans, and biopsies later, she was shocked to learn the source of her pain: malignant epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, an extremely rare type of liver cancer. This type of cancer affects the lining of the blood vessels within the liver and strikes only 200 to 300 Americans each year.

Referred by her local doctor to Robert Brown, MD at the Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Sharon was sick and in great pain. Yet because of the nature of her rare cancer, her entire liver was not affected, and therefore her MELD score – the criteria by which priority for liver transplantation is determined – was low. That meant she was unlikely to receive an organ from the national organ waitlist any time soon. Yet ironically, waiting meant that the cancer could spread beyond the liver, which would disqualify her from eligibility for transplantation.

Sharon Lupo & Mark Miller

Sharon Lupo & Mark Miller

Sharon accepted Dr. Brown’s suggestion of allowing a transplant from the ‘extended criteria’ list of donor organs. This includes organs that might not meet the usual criteria for transplantation, but are healthy enough for a successful transplant. She knew that living donor transplantation was a potential option, but she did not ask anyone in her family to consider it. She remained on the extended criteria waitlist, all the while undergoing frequent scans and injections of chemotherapy into her liver to try to keep the cancer at bay. She also underwent lung surgery to remove a small lung cancer during this time, a completely unrelated tumor detected during one of her many PET scans.

After the third of the chemotherapy injections (chemoembolisms), her liver suddenly began to fail. “I was in excruciating pain, I couldn’t eat, I was losing weight,” says Sharon. “Dr. Brown said we need to do the transplant now.” Sharon’s mother-in-law offered to be a donor, but her age exceeded the accepted limit.

Sharon’s brother, Mark Miller, called after learning of her situation. Having been out of touch with him for some time, Sharon was “utterly floored” that he wanted to donate part of his liver. Mark drove from the Philadelphia area to NYPH/Columbia, where he was evaluated as a potential donor. Thorough testing was done to see if their blood types were compatible (they were) and to ensure he was healthy enough to tolerate the operation (he was). Mark mobilized his family so that his children would be cared for while he and his wife were in New York.

According to Mark, “Dr. Samstein explained the risks of the surgery, and they gave me every opportunity to reconsider my decision to donate.” But his resolve stayed firm, and the surgeries proceeded in October. There were no complications; the operations went beautifully. The smaller left lobe of Mark’s liver was removed and transplanted into Sharon’s abdomen, where it would regenerate to the correct size and functionality, as would his remaining liver.

“The first few days after the operation were the most difficult of the recovery,” Mark says, because tasks that we take for granted like walking, eating, and breathing were very daunting. In only six days, however, he was well enough to leave the hospital; only a month later, he was back to work.

Mark attributes the speed of his recovery, and his overall success in getting through such a challenging ordeal, to the fact that he went into the operating room fully at peace with his decision to donate. To future donors, he advises preparing oneself both physically and psychologically for the surgery. Being mentally comfortable with the decision, he says, will make the surgery easier to undergo, and the recovery much smoother.

Mark’s health is completely back to normal; in fact, he’s in better shape than he was before the surgery. He would be doing triathlons if only he were a better swimmer, he jokes, and he’s still waiting for Dr. Samstein to take him up on his racquetball challenge.

Sharon’s recovery took longer, but today she is cancer-free, back at work, enjoying her family, and very grateful to be alive. “This taught me to live in the moment and enjoy every day,” Sharon says. There were bumps in the road, including an incisional hernia, which is very common, as well as two brief episodes of organ rejection that occurred when her doctors tried to wean her off the medications she takes to prevent organ rejection, but overall she feels well. She says she does not understand God’s plan in all of this, but she firmly believes that it “happened for a purpose” and that she is still here for a reason.

“I am completely grateful to Mark for saving my life,” she continues. “It takes a really special, selfless person to do what he did. I just celebrated my 20-year wedding anniversary, my 50th birthday (last year), and I was able to see my daughter graduate from high school. None of that would have been possible without this transplant.” Although the experience was difficult and frightening at many points, Sharon says the doctors, nurses and staff at the center were “incredible… They made something bad into something good,” she says.

{ 3 comments }

One Family’s Happy Ending is a Happy Beginning

by Columbia Surgery on April 21, 2012

When parents Lindsay and Alexander learned their second child, Cooper, might need an organ donor, they decided immediately who it would be. Lindsay explains, “We knew that I could be more of a multitasker after the transplant, when the family would need me to do a lot of caretaking. Plus, Alexander was gung ho. He is a fixer, and he wanted to fix Cooper.”

Cooper Alexander

Cooper suffered from biliary atresia, a condition in which bile flow from the liver to the gallbladder is blocked. This can lead to liver damage and cirrhosis of the liver, which is deadly if not treated. Diagnosed at six weeks, he was relatively stable and healthy for seven months. Then last November, his condition deteriorated, and it was time for a transplant. So Alexander, age 32, donated a portion of his liver to his eight-and-a-half-month old son in December 2011.

Cooper was in NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia’s Morgan Stanley Children’s Hospital for eight days and arrived home just in time for Christmas. Alexander, whose surgery was laparoscopic, went home three days later. Within three weeks, he was back at work as an insurance agent, and at six weeks he was playing basketball again.

Cooper weighed 15 pounds at the time of the transplant, and now weighs a robust 20 pounds. His mother, a social studies teacher, said, “He’s ravenous and eats all the time. He’s a textbook case. You would never know he had been sick.”

Cooper celebrated his first birthday in March 2012 and is talking, pointing, and almost walking. He can look forward to a healthy, normal childhood thanks to the work and passion of the living donor transplant team at NYP/Columbia’s Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation.

“We can’t say enough about Cooper’s doctors Jean Emond, Benjamin Samstein, Steven Lobritto, Nadia Ovchinsky, Mercedes Martinez, and Sylvia Hafliger,” Lindsay said. “We are in their debt for saving our son’s life.”

During the months leading up to the surgery, Lindsay said she and her husband were very frightened about their son.

“If I had known how hopeful I would feel the day he received his transplant,” she continued, “I wouldn’t have had to spend all those months feeling so scared. It was like a fresh start, he was a brand new baby. It was truly like it was his real birth day.”

{ 0 comments }

It is well documented that surgery to reconstruct the breast after mastectomy for breast cancer is an important factor in women’s quality of life and well-being in the long term. Because this is so important, the state of New York passed a law in 2010 requiring that general surgeons and oncologists discuss options and insurance coverage for breast reconstruction with their patients before performing cancer surgery.

Gatekeeper to Breast Reconstruction?

Gatekeeper to Breast Reconstruction?

Now, a study published in the March 2012 issue of the Journal of the American College of Surgeons, Improving Access to Care: Breast Surgeons, the Gatekeepers to Breast Reconstruction has found that patients referred by general surgeons or surgical oncologists for consultations with plastic surgeons are significantly more likely to undergo breast reconstruction after mastectomy than those patients not referred.

“Not all mastectomy patients will be candidates for breast reconstruction, and some may prefer not to undergo the surgery for personal reasons. However, our study findings indicate that general surgeons who have this discussion with patients, and ultimately refer them, play a very important role in the decision to undergo reconstruction as well as in access to this type of care,” said Christine H. Rohde, MD, senior author of the study.

“It is incumbent upon the general surgeon to refer mastectomy patients for consultations with plastic surgeons,” added Beth Aviva Preminger, MD, MPH, lead author. “Doing this for all mastectomy patients can ultimately improve patient care, as it has been well-documented that patients who receive breast reconstruction often experience an overall improved quality of life.”

{ 1 comment }

Medical ECMO Program Has New Home Online

by Columbia Surgery on April 19, 2012

Matthew Bacchetta, MD and Daniel Brodie, MD, Co-directors of the ECMO program at NewYork Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, are pleased to announce a new section on the Columbia website dedicated to this life-saving effort.

The Medical ECMO Program is part of the Center for Acute Respiratory Failure, which treats patients who rapidly develop respiratory failure — typically from acute respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia, trauma, pulmonary embolism, or flare-ups of chronic lung diseases such as asthma, emphysema, or cystic fibrosis — and who require advanced therapeutic interventions. The most advanced of these interventions is Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO).

ECMO involves a circuit outside the body (extracorporeal) that directly oxygenates and removes carbon dioxide from the blood. ECMO functions as an artificial lung to support the patient’s own failing lungs.

With most approaches to ECMO for respiratory failure, a catheter is placed in a central vein, usually near the heart. A mechanical pump draws blood from the vein into the circuit, where the blood passes along a membrane (referred to as an “oxygenator” or “gas exchanger”), providing an interface between the blood and freshly delivered oxygen.

Since its inception in 2006, the ECMO program’s innovative approach has been highly successful. The new website provides physicians and patients with comprehensive information on every aspect of the program, including the referral process and transport options, allowing an even greater chance for those in need of ECMO to find help quickly and efficiently.

{ 0 comments }